User:Lieutenant S. Reznov/sandbox

Response to deleted comment, available here: http://redsec.ru/img/src/1415548404149.png

Anti Soviet/Russian (Not interchangeable, except to racists) started with the former Nazis preaching their Kool-Aide to the US about the Eastern Front. They have had their way in convincing the West that the mass murders and rapes (24 million and 10 million respectively) by the Germans did not occur, yet blamed the victims and created the myth of widespread murder and perpetual rape by the Red Army in Germany.

Assuming that a .ru domain is blackhat is no different assuming that a Black person is a criminal. It's very simple. You can argue and be correct that it may be logical to avoid a Black person because statistically they might be a criminal, but you'll probably try to log into facebook-alerts.com (obvious phishing site) and be even more likely to get shot by a White meth head.



http://www.phpclasses.org/package/7214-PHP-Check-if-an-IP-is-TOR-network-exit-address.html

http://feline.interactivetheatre.org/webcit_admin_guide/user_accounts.html

Angry virgin

Nazi Arguments Exposed domain is down
I was just watching a history channel show on the Nazi's and one thing grabbed my attention which was pertinent to this topic. Hitler revoked German citizenship for all Jews. So the government wasn't even killing its own citizens, technically speaking. Of course this is why the word Holocaust was coined for state sponsored genocide of this magnitude. Genocide its self is the Greek root of massacre. To me, a massacre is not execution. If there is a line to be drawn (and I have stated my opinion befor), it should be at the individual level for states. A state killing one convicted man by lethal injection could and is semantically called an execution, I can agree with at least the semantics. A state killing 100 people in a gas chamber all at one time can not be called an execution. I like to think of my self a true wikipedian in that do understand and support the arguments for unbiased word choice, that is why I state my beliefs. I can not see how secret mass-killings can be classified as executions just because the were carried out by a state. They were hidden from the masses (not public knowledge), they were carried out against non-citizens during a time of war, and in large numbers. I looked at some actual definitions, and they seemed too vague to help. I think this will have to come down to consensus based on who makes the best arguments. Dkriegls 05:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)