Forum:User:Feldwebel

I am reporting User:Feldwebel for concern trolling the page War crimes against Germans on the Eastern Front. He has only a single meaningful contribution that was made at the request of another user. He has been told repeatedly that his views on the article are unacceptable] and not supported by reliable sources. His sources have included links to blatantly Neo Nazi websites among other dubious websites. His entire argument for changing the article revolves around the false Neo Nazi claim that historiography is supposedly victim blaming to Nazi women, and proposes revisionism that is considerably more victim blaming to Soviet Union. We should not tolerate such activity. I would ban him myself if I were able to. Dewey (talk) 13:53, 26 September 2014 (EDT)
 * Going to have to concur. I checked out some of his sources, and calling some of them fringe is an understatement. In fact, some come from source I know are nazi apologist at best and outright racist at worst. Arcane (talk) 14:15, 26 September 2014 (EDT)
 * Why am I being banned?? I did not intend to use any Nazi sources.  All I did was list sources that were available from Google.  I am against the Nazis anyway.  If they were written by Nazis then just ignore them. I have not vandalized pages or anything.  Feldwebel (talk) 11:09, 27 September 2014 (EDT)
 * You are not being banned yet. This is a discussion as to whether such a thing is justified, and since you have offered an explanation, I'm inclined to change my stance on the grounds you do a better job of examining the sources you find for bias in the future. For instance this source is pretty obviously anti-Soviet if not outright pro-Nazi, and rense.com is a known quack site with a history of antisemitism and promotion of other fringe and biased claims. Generally, a biased source is not automatically grounds for being judged as unsuitable so long as the basic facts can be verified against other less partisan sources, but most of the sources you have listed tend to have extreme partisan slants whose information cannot be backed up except by other partisan sources. Arcane (talk) 12:09, 27 September 2014 (EDT)
 * Feldwebel has offered extremely questionable sources and presented Nazi apologetic arguments, but so far he has not engaged in edit warring or POV pushing that would require blocking action. He should be aware that I will not engage in endless debate with him over sources and philosophical views.  Sources have established that the events of his problem article are not a typical example of men raping women in war, but rather the result of victims of genocide encountering the people responsible for those crimes.  I will not continue debate without reliable sources that support his claims.  Lieutenant S., Geschichtmeister des Lexipedium (talk) 13:02, 27 September 2014 (EDT)